Criterion D: Reflection

The “reflection” criterion assesses how the student reviews, analyses and evaluates the exploration.

Although reflection may be seen in the conclusion to the exploration, it may also be found throughout the exploration.

Simply describing results represents limited reflection. Further consideration is required to achieve the higher levels.                                                                                                                                                                               Some ways of showing meaningful reflection are: linking to the aims of the exploration, commenting on what they have learned, considering some limitation or comparing different mathematical approaches.

Critical reflection is reflection that is crucial, deciding or deeply insightful. It will often develop the exploration by addressing the mathematical results and their impact on the student’s understanding of the topic. Some ways of showing critical reflection are: considering what next, discussing implications of results, discussing strengths and weaknesses of approaches, and considering different perspectives.

Substantial evidence means that the critical reflection is present throughout the exploration. If it appears at the end of the exploration it must be of high quality and demonstrate how it developed the exploration in order to achieve a level 3